Re: "when communication is free, and therefore not alienated"

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ debord of directors ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Hate Company on January 29, 2000 at 01:03:08 PM EST:

In Reply to: Re: "when communication is free, and therefore not alienated" posted by hated reader on January 29, 2000 at 02:57:15 AM EST:

can you tell us again what could be a free communication and how a free communication can exists in a world of billions of humans scrambling for subsistance ?

"Scrambling for subsistance"? And where, sir, did you saw those? I can only see people scrambling for Communication. There's no lack of
food, there is no lack of resources, there is no
lack of wealth: there is just a lack of Communication. When there is Communication, nothing is missing. When there is not, everything is. As simple as that.

are the trees, flowers ans animals of the paradis terrestre communicating less alienation than the urban and productive and household constructs within which current humans are living?

Who said anything about "going back to nature"? Exactly the opposite: Communication is the opposite of nature, it is civilization. Our "urban constructs" are not civilized at all: they're way too natural.

I suggest you read your Voyer (and Hegel, and Marx, and some I.S for that matter), to prevent expressing questions of this naivety in the fture. OK?

Follow Ups:

Re : what could possibly be "civilized" communication? cuious2 04:27:51 AM 02/02/00 (4)
- Re: Re : what could possibly be "civilized" communication? Hate Company 07:33:10 AM 02/02/00 (3)
  - Re: Re : well, clear, how do you take in account the billions of humans? hatred idiot 10:18:18 AM 02/02/00 (2)
    - Re: Re : well, clear, how do you take in account the billions of humans? Loins 12:41:35 AM 02/08/00 (1)
      - Re: Re : thank you again for this link to "joy of revolutions" text curious reader 11:05:38 AM 02/08/00 (0)

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:
: can you tell us again what could be a free communication and how a free communication can exists in a world of billions of humans scrambling for subsistance ? : : : "Scrambling for subsistance"? And where, sir, did you saw those? I can only see people scrambling for Communication. There's no lack of : food, there is no lack of resources, there is no : lack of wealth: there is just a lack of Communication. When there is Communication, nothing is missing. When there is not, everything is. As simple as that. : are the trees, flowers ans animals of the paradis terrestre communicating less alienation than the urban and productive and household constructs within which current humans are living? : Who said anything about "going back to nature"? Exactly the opposite: Communication is the opposite of nature, it is civilization. Our "urban constructs" are not civilized at all: they're way too natural. : : I suggest you read your Voyer (and Hegel, and Marx, and some I.S for that matter), to prevent expressing questions of this naivety in the fture. OK?

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ debord of directors ] [ FAQ ]