pseudo (obligatoire)

email

texte (obligatoire)
[quote= *][quote]Pour la téléologie moderne, la réalité est un résultat. Il y a de la réalité quand il y a fin, destruction d’une pensée. Or cette fin, cette destruction elle-même, n’a pas de contour ni de contenu, et c’est pourquoi elle est insaisissable. La réalité force la pensée à reconstituer, à interpréter, à charger la fin d’une pensée d’un contenu qu’en général elle n’a pas. Dans cette façon de voir la réalité, il n’y a pas de chose réelle, il n’y a pas de fait réel – chose et fait ne sont que des catégories selon lesquelles la pensée se divise elle-même. La réalité est ce qui finit, ce qui détruit de la pensée, par conséquent on ne peut ni la voir, ni la toucher, ni se reposer dessus. On ne peut donc pas dire qu’un fait, une chose ou un jugement sont réels, on devrait dire qu’il y a de la réalité dans un fait, une chose, un jugement. Ce qui veut dire qu’il y a une destruction, effective, qui modifie fait, chose, jugement, et qui est irréversible, en cela indiscutable. 1: [i]For modern teleology, reality is a result. There is reality when a thought ends, is destroyed. Now, this end, this destruction itself has no contour or content, and that is why it is intangible, imperceptible. Reality forces thought to reconstitute, to interpret, to load the end of a thought with a content that it generally does not have. In this way of seeing reality, there is not any real thing or real fact – thing and fact are only categories in which thought divides itself. Reality is what ends, what destroys thought, and as a result we cannot see, touch or rely on it. So we cannot say that a fact, a thing or a judgement are real, we should say that there is reality in a fact, a thing, a judgement. This means that there is an actual destruction, which modifies fact, thing and judgement, and which is irreversible, and as such undisputable.[/i] 2: For modern teleology, reality is a result. There is reality when a thought ends, is destroyed. Now, this end, this destruction itself has no contour or content, and that is why it is ungraspable. Reality forces thought to reconstitute, to interpret, to load the end of a thought with a content that it generally does not have. In this way of seeing reality, there are not real things or real facts – things and facts are only categories by which thought divides itself. Reality is what ends, what destroys thought, and as a result we cannot see, touch or rely on it. Thus, we cannot say that a fact, a thing or a judgment are real, we should say that there is reality in a fact, in a thing, in a judgment. This means that there is an actual destruction, which modifies fact, thing and judgment, and which is irreversible, and as such indisputable.[/quote]    >  For modern teleology, reality is a result. There is reality when a thought ends, is destroyed. Now, this end, this destruction itself has no contour or content, and that is why it is [color=#2CA40E]ungraspable[/color]. Reality forces thought to reconstitute, to interpret, to load the end of a thought with a content that it generally does not have. In this way of seeing reality, [color=#CA1233]there is no real thing, there is no real fact–thing and fact[/color] are only categories in which thought divides itself. Reality is what ends, what destroys thought, and as a result [color=#CA1233]one can neither see it, touch it, nor rely on it. One[/color] cannot [color=#CA1233]therefore[/color] say that a fact, a thing or a judgment are real, [color=#CA1233]one[/color] should say that there is reality in a fact, a thing, a judgment. This means that there is a destruction[color=#CA1233], effective[/color], which modifies fact, thing and judgement, and which is irreversible, and as such undisputable. ⸻⸻⸻ to return to the part of the text you came from, use the browser's back-arrow / else [post=65][color=#a2acbb]#1[/color][/post][/quote]

• BBCode : activé
• balise [url] : activé
• balise [img] : activé
• émoticônes : activé