index
recherche
mise en forme
début
connexion
»
beats of teleology
»
2009 – Reality in Common Thought and Reality in Modern Teleology
»
répondre
pseudo
(obligatoire)
email
texte
(obligatoire)
[quote= *][quote]C’est par rapport à la catégorie de la vérité qu’on peut bien voir la différence entre la réalité telle qu’elle est généralement comprise aujourd’hui et la réalité telle qu’elle est théorisée dans la téléologie moderne. Dans les deux cas, la réalité a une valeur de vérité. Dans la vision actuelle, cette vérité est un a priori : la réalité est déjà là, indiscutable et donc sa vérité est indiscutable. Ce qui est subsumé sous la réalité est vrai, pour ainsi dire par définition. Cette vérité est pratique, mais elle valide des pans entiers de vérité théorique, et en particulier les catégories de la pensée, qui, dans la téléologie ne sont que des hypothèses utiles en leur temps, donc des leviers d’action relatifs aux circonstances. Dans la téléologie moderne, la réalité est la vérité aussi, mais c’est une vérité en tant qu’aboutissement d’une vérification. Dans la vision actuelle, la pensée vérifie la réalité, et donc la vérité dont la réalité est porteuse est une proposition de cohérence avec les constructions hypothétiques, une vérité théorique. Dans la téléologie moderne, la réalité vérifie de la pensée, rend vraie de la pensée en la finissant, en la détruisant, en l’accomplissant. La vérité est le résultat d’une vérification pratique. 1: [i]The difference between reality as it is usually understood today and reality as it is theorized in modern teleology is clearly visible in relation to the category of truth. In both cases, reality has a truth value. In the current view, this truth is a given, a priori: reality is there, undisputable, and so its truth is undisputable. What is subsumed in reality is truth by definition, so to speak. This truth is practical, but it validates entire sets of theoretical truths, and particularly categories of thought which, in teleology, are only hypotheses, useful in time, as tools for action in relation to the circumstances. In modern teleology, reality is also the truth, but it is a truth as the completion of a verification. In the current view, thought verifies reality, and so the truth carried by reality is a proposition of consistency with the hypothetical constructions, a theoretical truth. In modern teleology, reality verifies thought, makes thought true by ending it, by destroying it, by completing it. Truth is the result of a practical verification.[/i] 2: The difference between reality as it is usually understood today and reality as it is theorized in modern teleology is clearly visible in relation to the category of truth. In both cases, reality has a truth value. In the current view, this truth is a given, an a priori: reality is there, indisputable, and so its truth is indisputable. What is subsumed under reality is true by definition, so to speak. This truth is practical, but it validates whole sets of theoretical truths, and particularly categories of thought which, in teleology, are only hypotheses, useful in time, as tools for action in relation to the circumstances. In modern teleology, reality is also the truth, but it is a truth as culmination of a verification. In the current view, thought verifies reality, and so the truth carried by reality is a proposition of consistency with the hypothetical constructions, a theoretical truth. In modern teleology, reality verifies thought, makes thought true by ending it, by destroying it, by accomplishing it. Truth is the result of a practical verification.[/quote] > The difference between reality as it is usually understood today and reality as it is theorized in modern teleology is clearly visible in relation to the category of truth. In both cases, reality has a truth value. In the current [color=#CA1233]vision[/color], this truth i[color=#CA1233]s a[/color]n a priori: reality is [color=#CA1233]already[/color] there, undisputable, and so its truth is undisputable. What is subsumed under reality is [color=#2CA40E]true[/color], [color=#CA1233]so to speak, by definition[/color]. This truth is practical, but it validates entire sets of theoretical truths, and particularly categories of thought which, in teleology, are only hypotheses, useful in [color=#CA1233]their[/color] time, [color=#CA1233]and therefore[/color] tools for action relative to circumstances. In modern teleology, reality is also the truth, but it is a truth as the completion of a verification. In the current [color=#CA1233]vision[/color], thought verifies reality, and so the truth carried by reality is a proposition of consistency with hypothetical constructions, a theoretical truth. In modern teleology, reality verifies thought, makes thought true by ending it, by destroying it, by [color=#2CA40E]accomplishing[/color] it. Truth is the result of a practical verification. ⸻⸻⸻ to return to the part of the text you came from, use the browser's back-arrow / else [post=65][color=#a2acbb]#1[/color][/post][/quote]
BBCode :
activé
balise [url] :
activé
balise [img] :
activé
émoticônes :
activé
options
ne pas convertir les émoticônes dans ce texte
retour